Seismic design of steel braced frames in the modern building codes follow the capacity design approach where some of the members are obliged to dissipate energy whereas others are taken care to be protected. In this paper the seismic design methodologies used by European and American approaches for Concentric Cross Braced Frames (CCBF) and Eccentric Braced Frames (EBF) are highlighted. Synoptic tables for the design of such frames of the most advance seismic codes i.e., Eurocode 8 and the seismic provisions of American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) are provided. Emphasizes are made on the provisions of Eurocode 8 both for CCBF and EBF. Finally, a general conclusion is drawn when dealing with CCBF and EBF
Published in | American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15 |
Page(s) | 41-47 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Steel Brace Frames, Capacity Design, Cross Bracing, Eccentric Bracing, Seismic Design
[1] | T. Paulay and M. J. N. Priestley, Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings: Wiley Online Library, 1992. |
[2] | A. Plumier, "General report on local ductility," Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 55, pp. 91-107, 2000. |
[3] | G. Brandonisio, et al., "Seismic design of concentric braced frames," Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 78, pp. 22-37, 11// 2012. |
[4] | M. T. Naqash, "Optimum design of Steel Moment Resisting Frames using Eurocode 8," PhD Doctorate Thesis, Department of Engineering and Geology, University of Chiete and Pescara, Pescara, 2012. |
[5] | R. Sabelli, et al., "Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces," Engineering Structures, vol. 25, pp. 655-666, 2003. |
[6] | P. Uriz and S. A. Mahin, "Seismic performance assessment of concentrically braced steel frames," in Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, 2004, p. 6. |
[7] | ANSI/AISC-360-10, "Specification for structural steel buildings," ed. Chicago, Illinois 60601-1802: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010. |
[8] | ANSI/AISC-341-10, "Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings," ed. Chicago, Illinois 60601-1802: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010. |
[9] | A. Elghazouli, "Assessment of capacity design approaches for steel framed structures," Journal of Steel Structures, vol. 5, pp. 465-475, 2005. |
[10] | EN-1993-1-1, "Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures, Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings," in European Committee for Standardization, CEN, ed. 36 B-1050, Brussels, 2005. |
[11] | EN-1998-1, "Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings," in European Committee for Standardization, CEN, ed. 36 B-1050, Brussels, 2005. |
[12] | ASCE/SEI-7-10, "Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures," ed. 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston, Virginia 20191: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010. |
[13] | M. T. Naqash, et al., "Seismic design of Steel Moment Resisting frames-European Versus American Practice," NED University Journal of Research, vol. THEMATIC ISSUE ON EARTHQUAKE, 2012, In Press In Press. |
[14] | EN-1998-1, "Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings," in European Committee for Standardization, CEN, ed. 36 B-1050, Brussels, 2005. |
[15] | O. Bursi and J.-P. Jaspart, "Calibration of a finite element model for isolated bolted end-plate steel connections," Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 44, pp. 225-262, 1997. |
[16] | C. W. Roeder and E. P. Popov, "Inelastic behavior of eccentrically braced steel frames under cyclic loadings," NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, vol. 78, p. 20375, 1977. |
APA Style
Muhammad Tayyab Naqash, Khalid Mahmood, Salim Khoso. (2014). An Overview on the Seismic Design of Braced Frames. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(2), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15
ACS Style
Muhammad Tayyab Naqash; Khalid Mahmood; Salim Khoso. An Overview on the Seismic Design of Braced Frames. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2014, 2(2), 41-47. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15
AMA Style
Muhammad Tayyab Naqash, Khalid Mahmood, Salim Khoso. An Overview on the Seismic Design of Braced Frames. Am J Civ Eng. 2014;2(2):41-47. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15, author = {Muhammad Tayyab Naqash and Khalid Mahmood and Salim Khoso}, title = {An Overview on the Seismic Design of Braced Frames}, journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, pages = {41-47}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20140202.15}, abstract = {Seismic design of steel braced frames in the modern building codes follow the capacity design approach where some of the members are obliged to dissipate energy whereas others are taken care to be protected. In this paper the seismic design methodologies used by European and American approaches for Concentric Cross Braced Frames (CCBF) and Eccentric Braced Frames (EBF) are highlighted. Synoptic tables for the design of such frames of the most advance seismic codes i.e., Eurocode 8 and the seismic provisions of American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) are provided. Emphasizes are made on the provisions of Eurocode 8 both for CCBF and EBF. Finally, a general conclusion is drawn when dealing with CCBF and EBF}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Overview on the Seismic Design of Braced Frames AU - Muhammad Tayyab Naqash AU - Khalid Mahmood AU - Salim Khoso Y1 - 2014/03/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15 T2 - American Journal of Civil Engineering JF - American Journal of Civil Engineering JO - American Journal of Civil Engineering SP - 41 EP - 47 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.15 AB - Seismic design of steel braced frames in the modern building codes follow the capacity design approach where some of the members are obliged to dissipate energy whereas others are taken care to be protected. In this paper the seismic design methodologies used by European and American approaches for Concentric Cross Braced Frames (CCBF) and Eccentric Braced Frames (EBF) are highlighted. Synoptic tables for the design of such frames of the most advance seismic codes i.e., Eurocode 8 and the seismic provisions of American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) are provided. Emphasizes are made on the provisions of Eurocode 8 both for CCBF and EBF. Finally, a general conclusion is drawn when dealing with CCBF and EBF VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -