In this study we use the alternate point of view on the structure of ordinals, according to which each ordinal is the union of non-intersecting foregoing segments of ordinals of equal exponentiation. Each ordinal is seen as the union for any j=1, n-1 instead traditional union of foregoing intersecting segments of ordinals of consistently increasing exponentiation . The first form corresponds to the geometric representation of ordinal as an infinite n-dimensional matrix. According traditional formulation , thus is -countable union of countable ordinals so is countable. According to alternate formulation for any n, thus is -union of ordinals and the findings will be different. These findings are: 1) the proof of countability of countable union of countable ordinals can not be directly or inductively transferred to its first limit -union; 2) seems to be the first uncountable ordinal with its power is equal to continuum; 3) the subsequent ascending degrees of -exponentiation of , i.e. , ,..., correspond to consecutive , , , ... cardinals; 4) from here it also follows the direct justification of continuum hypothesis. Our study shows that in the domain of transfinite sets different points of view and its findings have the legal right to coexist as Nels Bohr's principle of complementarity in physics.
Published in | Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14 |
Page(s) | 108-112 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Set Theory, Ordinals, Mathematical Induction, Absolute Truth
[1] | Georg Cantor, 1878, Ein beitrag zur mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Journal fr die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 84, 242-258. |
[2] | Georg Cantor, 1883, Grundlagen einer allge. meinen Mannigfaltigkeitslehre: Ein mathematisch-philo-sophischer Versuch in der Lehre des Unendlichen. Leipzig: Teubner. |
[3] | Deza, E., Deza, M., 2011, Figurate Numbers. World Scientific. |
[4] | Felix Hausdorff, 1914, Grundzuge der Mengenlehre. Veit and Company, Leipzig. |
[5] | Stephen Cole Kleene, 1967, Mathematical logic. N. Y. |
[6] | Morris Kline, 1980, Mathematics. The loss of certainty. N. Y. |
[7] | Kuratowski K., Mostowski A., 1967, Set theory. Amsterdam. |
[8] | Lisi M., 2007, Some remarks on the Cantor pairing function. Le Matematiche, 62(1), 55-65. |
[9] | Maydim A. Malkov, 2014, Stairs of Natural Set Theories, Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal. 3(3), 49-65. |
[10] | Vereshchagin N. K., Shen A., 2002, Lectures on mathematical logic and theory of algorithms. Moscow, MCNME. |
APA Style
Alexey Pavlovich Kulaichev. (2016). The Problem of Countability of Highest Ordinals. Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal, 5(4), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14
ACS Style
Alexey Pavlovich Kulaichev. The Problem of Countability of Highest Ordinals. Pure Appl. Math. J. 2016, 5(4), 108-112. doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14
AMA Style
Alexey Pavlovich Kulaichev. The Problem of Countability of Highest Ordinals. Pure Appl Math J. 2016;5(4):108-112. doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14
@article{10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14, author = {Alexey Pavlovich Kulaichev}, title = {The Problem of Countability of Highest Ordinals}, journal = {Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal}, volume = {5}, number = {4}, pages = {108-112}, doi = {10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pamj.20160504.14}, abstract = {In this study we use the alternate point of view on the structure of ordinals, according to which each ordinal is the union of non-intersecting foregoing segments of ordinals of equal exponentiation. Each ordinal is seen as the union for any j=1, n-1 instead traditional union of foregoing intersecting segments of ordinals of consistently increasing exponentiation . The first form corresponds to the geometric representation of ordinal as an infinite n-dimensional matrix. According traditional formulation , thus is -countable union of countable ordinals so is countable. According to alternate formulation for any n, thus is -union of ordinals and the findings will be different. These findings are: 1) the proof of countability of countable union of countable ordinals can not be directly or inductively transferred to its first limit -union; 2) seems to be the first uncountable ordinal with its power is equal to continuum; 3) the subsequent ascending degrees of -exponentiation of , i.e. , ,..., correspond to consecutive , , , ... cardinals; 4) from here it also follows the direct justification of continuum hypothesis. Our study shows that in the domain of transfinite sets different points of view and its findings have the legal right to coexist as Nels Bohr's principle of complementarity in physics.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Problem of Countability of Highest Ordinals AU - Alexey Pavlovich Kulaichev Y1 - 2016/06/28 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14 DO - 10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14 T2 - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal JF - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal JO - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal SP - 108 EP - 112 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9812 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20160504.14 AB - In this study we use the alternate point of view on the structure of ordinals, according to which each ordinal is the union of non-intersecting foregoing segments of ordinals of equal exponentiation. Each ordinal is seen as the union for any j=1, n-1 instead traditional union of foregoing intersecting segments of ordinals of consistently increasing exponentiation . The first form corresponds to the geometric representation of ordinal as an infinite n-dimensional matrix. According traditional formulation , thus is -countable union of countable ordinals so is countable. According to alternate formulation for any n, thus is -union of ordinals and the findings will be different. These findings are: 1) the proof of countability of countable union of countable ordinals can not be directly or inductively transferred to its first limit -union; 2) seems to be the first uncountable ordinal with its power is equal to continuum; 3) the subsequent ascending degrees of -exponentiation of , i.e. , ,..., correspond to consecutive , , , ... cardinals; 4) from here it also follows the direct justification of continuum hypothesis. Our study shows that in the domain of transfinite sets different points of view and its findings have the legal right to coexist as Nels Bohr's principle of complementarity in physics. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -