Purpose: The measurement of patient satisfaction by the provided health services in outpatient clinic of the General Hospital of Athens. Material-Method: To measure the satisfaction of health service users was chosen a sample of 400 people using the method of stratified random sampling. The data were collected using a weighted structured questionnaire in those who had an appointment with the hospital doctors (period from 1st to June 30th 2012). The evaluation of patient satisfaction for services imprinted in two ways: (a) assessment of total services in ten-point scale, where 1 represents dissatisfied and 10 very satisfied and (B) assessment of individual medical, nursing and administrative services with the five-point scale. The five-point scale was established as follows: value 1: very bad 2: rather bad 3: neither good nor bad, 4: rather good 5: very good. For the statistical analysis was used descriptive statistics, t test and ANONA test. Results: The response percentage of interviewees reached 83.25%. In assessing the overall satisfaction was found that in the ten-point scale, the Hospital is evaluated positively. The average total score of evaluation is quite high (8.3). Important parameters of satisfaction for the majority of patients were courtesy, specialized knowledge and the professionalism of the staff of outpatient clinic. 85.29% of the sample declared absolutely satisfied by the behavior of the reception staff, 72.37% by the behavior of doctors, 69.67% by the quality of nursing care. However, the problematic aspects of the visit were identified to the responsiveness, the access, the outpatient clinics and the accommodations infrastructure. The lowest percentage of completely satisfied corresponds to the replies on the notice boards and on the information at the hospital entrance (5.41% and 5.71% respectively). Dissatisfaction was expressed for the long waiting time between the desired date for visit and the scheduled date (percentage of fully satisfied 14.71%), as well as for waiting time in order to be respect the scheduled time (percentage of fully satisfied 12.01%). Noteworthy is that the majority of interviewees would recommend the hospital to friends and family environment (percentages: definitely yes 58, 86%, rather yes 36.94%). Conclusions: The overall assessment of the services provided by the outpatient clinic of Hospital was positive. However, it appeared to have problems in the organization, delays and infrastructure of clinics, for which must be taken corrective measures to ensure that the services that patients benefit are characterized by high quality.
Published in | Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10 |
Page(s) | 128-135 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Public Hospitals, Outpatient Clinics, Patient Satisfaction
[1] | Behm A., Bennington L., Cummane J. (2000) A value-creating model for effective policy services, Journal of Management Development, 19 (3): 162-178. |
[2] | Merkouris A., Papathanasoglou E., Lemonidou C. (2003) Evaluation of patient satisfaction with nursing care. Quantitative or Qualitative approach? International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41 (4), 355-67. |
[3] | Smith P. C., York N. (2004) Quality incentives: the case of U. K. general practitioners, HealthAffairs (Millwood), 23 (3): 112-118. |
[4] | Sarris M. (2001) Sociology of health and quality of life, Papazisis, Athens, 450. |
[5] | Merkouris A. (1996) The satisfaction of the patient. Criterion quality nursing services. Doctoral Thesis. University of Athens. School of Health Sciences. Nursing Department. Athens. |
[6] | Prakash B. (2010) Patient satisfaction. J. Cutan Aesthet. Surg., 3 (3): 151-155. |
[7] | Al-Abri R., Al-Balushi A. (2014) Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Review Article. Oman Med. J., 29 (1): 3-7. |
[8] | Bleich S. N., Ozaltin E., Murray C. K. (2009) How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bulletin of the World Health Organization (WHO), 87: 271-278. |
[9] | Smith C. (1992) Validation of a patient satisfaction system in the United Kingdom. Qual. Assur. Health Care, 4 (3): 171−177. |
[10] | Donabedian A. (1988) Quality assessment and assurance: Unity of purpose, diversity of means. Inquiry 25 (1): 173–192. |
[11] | Donabedian A. (1988) The quality of care. How it can be assessed? JAMA, 260 (12): 1743-1748. |
[12] | Avis M., Bond M., Arthur A. (1995) Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J. Adv. Nurs., 22(2): 316-322. |
[13] | Guzman P. M., Sliepcevich E. M., Lacey E. P., VitelloE. M., Matten M. R., WoehlkeP. L. et al. (1988) Tapping patient satisfaction: A strategy for quality assessment. Patient Educ. Couns., 12(3):225-233. |
[14] | Petersen M. B. (1988) Measuring patient satisfaction: Collecting useful data. J. Nurs. Qual. Assur. 1988, 2 (3): 25-35. |
[15] | Tsaousoglou A., Koukourikos K. (2007) Quality and health services Stigma, 15 (2): 18-24. |
[16] | Pierrakos C. (2008) Primary health care and local community Papazisis, Athens, 99. |
[17] | Papanikolaou V. (1994) Satisfying healthcare users in Greece. Doctoral thesis. Department of Psychology. Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences. Athens. |
[18] | Carr-Hill R. A. (1992) The measurement of patient satisfaction. J. Public Health Med., 14 (3): 236-249. |
[19] | Zoller J. S., Lackland D. T., Silverstein M. D. (2001) Predicting patient intent to return from satisfaction scores. J. Ambul. CareManage, 24 (1): 44-50. |
[20] | Aletras V., Zacharaki F.,. Niakas D. (2007) Questionnaire for the measurement of outpatient satisfaction in the ophthalmology clinic of a Greek public hospital. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 24 (1): 89–96. |
[21] | Pierrakos G., Sarris M., Soulis S., Goula A., Latsou D., Pateras I., Vourliotou K., Giannoulatos P. (2013) Comparative analysis of two studies of outpatient satisfaction in primary medical care. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 30 (3): 316–324. |
[22] | Hiidenhovi H., Nojonen K., Laippala P. (2002) Measurement of outpatients’ views of service quality in a Finnish university hospital. J Adv. Nurs., 38 (1): 59-67. |
[23] | Bergenmar M., Nylen U., Lidbrink E., Brandberg Y. (2006) Improvements in satisfaction at an outpatient clinic for patients with breast cancer. ActaOncol, 45 (5): 550-558. |
[24] | Ekwall A., Gerdtz M., Manias E. (2008) The influence of patient acuity on satisfaction with emergency care: Perspectives of family, friends and carers. J. Clin. Nurs., 17 (6): 800-809. |
[25] | Gabriel Ε., Theodorou Μ., Middleton Ν.(2012) Patient satisfaction from the services provided by the outpatient clinics in the public hospitals of Cyprus. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 29 (6): 720–730. |
[26] | Kabadai M., Niakas D. (2004) Patient satisfaction with services provided by a Community Mental Health Center in northern Greece. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 21 (4): 354–362. |
[27] | Niakas D., Gnardelis Ch. (2000) Satisfaction inpatient in a regional general hospital in Athens. Medicine, 77 (5): 464-470. |
[28] | Shou-Hisa C., Ming-Chin Y., Tung-Uang C. (2003) Patient satisfaction with and recommendation of a hospital: effects of interpersonal and technical aspects of hospital care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15 (4): 345-355. |
[29] | Bjertnaes O. A., Sjetne I. S., Iversen H. H. (2012) Overall patient satisfaction with hospitals: effects of patient-reported experiences and fulfillment of expectations. British Medical Journal Quality Safety, 21 (1): 39- 46. |
[30] | Tonio S., Joerg K., Joachim K. (2011) Determinants of patient satisfaction: a study among 39 hospitals in an in-patient setting in Germany. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 23 (5): 503-509. |
[31] | Rama M., Kanagaluru S. K. (2011) A study on the satisfaction of patients with reference to hospital services. International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research, 1 (3): 15-25. |
[32] | Koichiro O., Brian W., Kelly M. F., Sarah B., Thomas E. B., Claiborne D. (2009), Patient Satisfaction: Focusing on "Excellent", Journal of Healthcare Management, 54 (2): 93-103. |
[33] | Quintana J. M., Gonzalez N., Bilbao A., Aizpuru F., Escobar A., Esteban C., San- Sebastian J. A., De la Sierra E., Thompson A. (2006) Predictors of patient satisfaction with hospital health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6:102, pp.1-9. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/102. |
[34] | Papagiannopoulou V., Pierrakos G., Sarris Μ. (2008) Yfantopoulos J. Measuring satisfaction with health care services in an Athens pediatric hospital. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 25 (1): 73-81. |
APA Style
Georgoudi Ekaterina, Kyriazis Stavros, Mihalache Anca, Kourkouta Lambrini. (2017). Measurement of Patient Satisfaction as a Quality Indicator of Hospital Health Services: The Case of Outpatient Clinics in General Hospital. Science Journal of Public Health, 5(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10
ACS Style
Georgoudi Ekaterina; Kyriazis Stavros; Mihalache Anca; Kourkouta Lambrini. Measurement of Patient Satisfaction as a Quality Indicator of Hospital Health Services: The Case of Outpatient Clinics in General Hospital. Sci. J. Public Health 2017, 5(2), 128-135. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10
AMA Style
Georgoudi Ekaterina, Kyriazis Stavros, Mihalache Anca, Kourkouta Lambrini. Measurement of Patient Satisfaction as a Quality Indicator of Hospital Health Services: The Case of Outpatient Clinics in General Hospital. Sci J Public Health. 2017;5(2):128-135. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10
@article{10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10, author = {Georgoudi Ekaterina and Kyriazis Stavros and Mihalache Anca and Kourkouta Lambrini}, title = {Measurement of Patient Satisfaction as a Quality Indicator of Hospital Health Services: The Case of Outpatient Clinics in General Hospital}, journal = {Science Journal of Public Health}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {128-135}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjph.20170502.10}, abstract = {Purpose: The measurement of patient satisfaction by the provided health services in outpatient clinic of the General Hospital of Athens. Material-Method: To measure the satisfaction of health service users was chosen a sample of 400 people using the method of stratified random sampling. The data were collected using a weighted structured questionnaire in those who had an appointment with the hospital doctors (period from 1st to June 30th 2012). The evaluation of patient satisfaction for services imprinted in two ways: (a) assessment of total services in ten-point scale, where 1 represents dissatisfied and 10 very satisfied and (B) assessment of individual medical, nursing and administrative services with the five-point scale. The five-point scale was established as follows: value 1: very bad 2: rather bad 3: neither good nor bad, 4: rather good 5: very good. For the statistical analysis was used descriptive statistics, t test and ANONA test. Results: The response percentage of interviewees reached 83.25%. In assessing the overall satisfaction was found that in the ten-point scale, the Hospital is evaluated positively. The average total score of evaluation is quite high (8.3). Important parameters of satisfaction for the majority of patients were courtesy, specialized knowledge and the professionalism of the staff of outpatient clinic. 85.29% of the sample declared absolutely satisfied by the behavior of the reception staff, 72.37% by the behavior of doctors, 69.67% by the quality of nursing care. However, the problematic aspects of the visit were identified to the responsiveness, the access, the outpatient clinics and the accommodations infrastructure. The lowest percentage of completely satisfied corresponds to the replies on the notice boards and on the information at the hospital entrance (5.41% and 5.71% respectively). Dissatisfaction was expressed for the long waiting time between the desired date for visit and the scheduled date (percentage of fully satisfied 14.71%), as well as for waiting time in order to be respect the scheduled time (percentage of fully satisfied 12.01%). Noteworthy is that the majority of interviewees would recommend the hospital to friends and family environment (percentages: definitely yes 58, 86%, rather yes 36.94%). Conclusions: The overall assessment of the services provided by the outpatient clinic of Hospital was positive. However, it appeared to have problems in the organization, delays and infrastructure of clinics, for which must be taken corrective measures to ensure that the services that patients benefit are characterized by high quality.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Measurement of Patient Satisfaction as a Quality Indicator of Hospital Health Services: The Case of Outpatient Clinics in General Hospital AU - Georgoudi Ekaterina AU - Kyriazis Stavros AU - Mihalache Anca AU - Kourkouta Lambrini Y1 - 2017/02/23 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10 DO - 10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10 T2 - Science Journal of Public Health JF - Science Journal of Public Health JO - Science Journal of Public Health SP - 128 EP - 135 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7950 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20170502.10 AB - Purpose: The measurement of patient satisfaction by the provided health services in outpatient clinic of the General Hospital of Athens. Material-Method: To measure the satisfaction of health service users was chosen a sample of 400 people using the method of stratified random sampling. The data were collected using a weighted structured questionnaire in those who had an appointment with the hospital doctors (period from 1st to June 30th 2012). The evaluation of patient satisfaction for services imprinted in two ways: (a) assessment of total services in ten-point scale, where 1 represents dissatisfied and 10 very satisfied and (B) assessment of individual medical, nursing and administrative services with the five-point scale. The five-point scale was established as follows: value 1: very bad 2: rather bad 3: neither good nor bad, 4: rather good 5: very good. For the statistical analysis was used descriptive statistics, t test and ANONA test. Results: The response percentage of interviewees reached 83.25%. In assessing the overall satisfaction was found that in the ten-point scale, the Hospital is evaluated positively. The average total score of evaluation is quite high (8.3). Important parameters of satisfaction for the majority of patients were courtesy, specialized knowledge and the professionalism of the staff of outpatient clinic. 85.29% of the sample declared absolutely satisfied by the behavior of the reception staff, 72.37% by the behavior of doctors, 69.67% by the quality of nursing care. However, the problematic aspects of the visit were identified to the responsiveness, the access, the outpatient clinics and the accommodations infrastructure. The lowest percentage of completely satisfied corresponds to the replies on the notice boards and on the information at the hospital entrance (5.41% and 5.71% respectively). Dissatisfaction was expressed for the long waiting time between the desired date for visit and the scheduled date (percentage of fully satisfied 14.71%), as well as for waiting time in order to be respect the scheduled time (percentage of fully satisfied 12.01%). Noteworthy is that the majority of interviewees would recommend the hospital to friends and family environment (percentages: definitely yes 58, 86%, rather yes 36.94%). Conclusions: The overall assessment of the services provided by the outpatient clinic of Hospital was positive. However, it appeared to have problems in the organization, delays and infrastructure of clinics, for which must be taken corrective measures to ensure that the services that patients benefit are characterized by high quality. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -