The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism

Tao Wang; Jun Zhuang

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13

| Peer-Reviewed

The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism

Tao Wang, Jun Zhuang

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 6)

Received: 3 September 2017 Accepted: 25 September 2017 Published: 21 November 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This research mainly focuses on the divergences and controversies over defining terrorism and how to define, understand and deal with terrorism. Based on the systematic survey and study of previous definitions about terrorism and fully referring to other relevant information and data, this article is devoted to exploring the main characteristics and nature of terrorism, then putting forward a clear, pragmatic and widely accepted definition of terrorism from a relatively unique perspective, and then not only tries to use it as a tool to explain, clarify and solve the problems relating to terrorism in reality, but also deepen the battle against the intangible conception of terrorism by proposing some suggestions to strike at the tangible entity of terrorist organizations and terrorists.

Published in	Social Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13
Page(s)	160-168
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Terrorism, Terrorist Organization, Terrorist, Terrorist Attack, Definition, Combating Terrorism

References

[1]	Fry, J. D. (2002). Terrorism as a Crime Against Humanity and Genocide: The Backdoor to Universal Jurisdiction. UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff., 7, 169.
[2]	Williamson, M. (2013). Terrorism, war and international law: the legality of the use of force against Afghanistan in 2001. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. p. 38.
[3]	Wardlaw, G. (1989). Political terrorism: Theory, tactics and counter-measures. Cambridge University Press.
[4]	Zeidan, S. (2003). Desperately seeking definition: the international community's quest for identifying the specter of terrorism. Cornell Int'l LJ, 36, 491. p. 491–492.
[5]	Wedgwood, R. (2005). The ICJ advisory opinion on the Israeli security fence and the limits of self-defense. The American Journal of International Law, 99 (1), 52-61.
[6]	Bogatyrenko, O. (2007, February). Definitional analysis of terrorism: constructing concepts and populations for social science research. In meeting of the International Studies Association (p. 2). p. 90.
[7]	Silke, A. (1996). Terrorism and the blind men's elephant. Terrorism and Political Violence, 8 (3), 12-28. p. 13.
[8]	Richards, A. (2014). Conceptualizing terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37 (3).
[9]	Schmid, A. (2004). Terrorism-the definitional problem. Case W. Res. J. Int'l L., 36, 375.
[10]	Simon, Jeffrey D. (1994). The Terrorist Trap. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
[11]	White, J. R. (2003). Terrorism: an introduction. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
[12]	“DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms.” DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Accessed November 11, 2012. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/dod_dictionary/
[13]	Ruby, C. L. (2002). The definition of terrorism. Analyses of social issues and public policy, 2(1), 9-14.
[14]	Stern, J. (2003, September). Terror in the name of God: Why religious militants kill. New York: Ecco.
[15]	Watson, F. M. (1976). Political terrorism: The threat and the response. RB Luce Company.
[16]	Jongman, A. J. (1988). Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories, and literature. transaction Publishers.
[17]	Laqueur, W. (1987). The age of terrorism (p. 287). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
[18]	Miao, D. (2006). On the Consummation of Counter-Terrorism Legislation of China. Law Science (Journal of Northwest University of Politics and Law). (I), 141-146.
[19]	Netanyahu, B. (1995). Fighting terrorism: How democracies can defeat domestic and international terrorists. Macmillan.
[20]	Hanle, D. J. (2007). Terrorism: The newest face of warfare. Potomac Books, Inc..
[21]	Tucker, D. (1997). Skirmishes at the edge of empire: the United States and international terrorism. Greenwood Publishing Group.
[22]	Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press.
[23]	Khan, A. (1987). A Theory of International Terrorism. Connecticut Law Review, 19, 945.
[24]	Higgins, R. (1997). The general international law of terrorism. Terrorism and International Law. Place.
[25]	Richardson, L. (1999). Terrorists as transnational actors. Terrorism and Political Violence, 11 (4), 209-219.
[26]	Sloan‐Lynch, J. (2012). Domestic abuse as terrorism. Hypatia, 27(4), 774-790.
[27]	SANA 16 September 2015. President Bashar al-Assad Interview: “We are at War with Terrorism, and this Terrorism is supported by Foreign Powers”.
[28]	Syria's Links to Terrorism Compiled for the Online NewsHour by David Butterworth for PBS Posted: 9 March 2005.
[29]	Turkey accuses Syria of 'state terrorism' By ELIZABETH A. KENNEDY, Associated Press\| 5 September 2012.
[30]	Richards, A. (2014). Conceptualizing terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37 (3), 213-236.
[31]	Türker, A. T., & Crenshaw, M. (2013). Explaining terrorism: causes, processes and consequences. Wiley.
[32]	Jenkins, B. M. (1980). The study of terrorism: definitional problems (No. RAND/P-6563). RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA. p. 2.
[33]	Esposito, J. L., & Mogahed, D. (2007). BATTLE FOR MUSLIMS'HEARTS AND MINDS: THE ROAD NOT (YET) TAKEN. Middle East Policy, 14 (1), 27.
[34]	Crenshaw, M. (1992). Current research on terrorism: The academic perspective. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 15(1), 1-11.
[35]	Schmid, A. P. (Ed). (2011). The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. Taylor & Francis.
[36]	Franks, J. (2009). Rethinking the Roots of Terrorism: Beyond Orthodox Terrorism Theory—A Critical Research Agenda∗. Global Society, 23 (2), 153-176.
[37]	quote Connolly, T. (2011). 5 The challenges of conceptualizing terrorism. Terrorism Studies: A Reader, 76.
[38]	Laqueur, W. (2004). The terrorism to come. Policy Review, 126, 49-64.
[39]	Richardson, L. (2007). What terrorists want: Understanding the enemy, containing the threat. Random House Incorporated.
[40]	Gearty, C. (1991). Terror. Faber & Faber.
[41]	Arowolo, D. E. (2013). Terrorism, democracy and global security. European Scientific Journal, 9 (2).
[42]	Schmid, A. (2005). Terrorism as psychological warfare. Democracy and Security, 1 (2), 137-146.
[43]	Addicott, J. F. (2009). Efficacy of the Obama Policies to Combat Al-Qa'eda, the Taliban, and Associated Forces-The First Year. Pace L. Rev., 30, 340.
[44]	Shafritz, J. M., Gibbons, E. F., & Scott, G. E. (1991). Almanac of modern terrorism. Facts on File.
[45]	Acharya, U. D. (2009). War on terror or terror wars: the problem in defining terrorism. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 37 (4).
[46]	Waugh, W. L. (1982). International terrorism: How nations respond to terrorists (pp. 210-212). Salisbury, NC: Documentary Publications.
[47]	Sinclair, A. (2004). An anatomy of terror: a history of terrorism. Pan Macmillan.
[48]	Wardlaw, G. (1989). Political terrorism: Theory, tactics and counter-measures. Cambridge University Press. p. 38.
[49]	Hoffman, B. (2013). Al Qaeda's Uncertain Future. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36 (8).
[50]	Carlson, A. C. (1999). “You know it when you see it:” The rhetorical hierarchy of race and gender in Rhinelander v. Rhinelander. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 85 (2), 111-128.
[51]	Bush, G. W. (2001). Address to a joint session of Congress and the American people. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y, 25, xviii.
[52]	Ganor, B. (2002). Defining terrorism: Is one man's terrorist another man's freedom fighter?. Police Practice and Research, 3(4), 287-304.
[53]	Marsavelski, A. (2012). Crime of Terrorism and the Right of Revolution in International Law, The. Conn. J. Int'l L., 28.
[54]	Kampf, Z. (2014). News‐Media and Terrorism: Changing Relationship, Changing Definitions. Sociology Compass, 8(1), 1-9.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tao Wang, Jun Zhuang. (2017). The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Social Sciences, 6(6), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tao Wang; Jun Zhuang. The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(6), 160-168. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tao Wang, Jun Zhuang. The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Soc Sci. 2017;6(6):160-168. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13,
  author = {Tao Wang and Jun Zhuang},
  title = {The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {6},
  pages = {160-168},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20170606.13},
  abstract = {This research mainly focuses on the divergences and controversies over defining terrorism and how to define, understand and deal with terrorism. Based on the systematic survey and study of previous definitions about terrorism and fully referring to other relevant information and data, this article is devoted to exploring the main characteristics and nature of terrorism, then putting forward a clear, pragmatic and widely accepted definition of terrorism from a relatively unique perspective, and then not only tries to use it as a tool to explain, clarify and solve the problems relating to terrorism in reality, but also deepen the battle against the intangible conception of terrorism by proposing some suggestions to strike at the tangible entity of terrorist organizations and terrorists.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism
AU  - Tao Wang
AU  - Jun Zhuang
Y1  - 2017/11/21
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 160
EP  - 168
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13
AB  - This research mainly focuses on the divergences and controversies over defining terrorism and how to define, understand and deal with terrorism. Based on the systematic survey and study of previous definitions about terrorism and fully referring to other relevant information and data, this article is devoted to exploring the main characteristics and nature of terrorism, then putting forward a clear, pragmatic and widely accepted definition of terrorism from a relatively unique perspective, and then not only tries to use it as a tool to explain, clarify and solve the problems relating to terrorism in reality, but also deepen the battle against the intangible conception of terrorism by proposing some suggestions to strike at the tangible entity of terrorist organizations and terrorists.
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tao Wang

Anti-terrorism Division, Public Security Department of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing City, China
Jun Zhuang

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo of SUNY, Buffalo, America

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tao Wang, Jun Zhuang. (2017). The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Social Sciences, 6(6), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tao Wang; Jun Zhuang. The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(6), 160-168. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tao Wang, Jun Zhuang. The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism. Soc Sci. 2017;6(6):160-168. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13,
  author = {Tao Wang and Jun Zhuang},
  title = {The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {6},
  pages = {160-168},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20170606.13},
  abstract = {This research mainly focuses on the divergences and controversies over defining terrorism and how to define, understand and deal with terrorism. Based on the systematic survey and study of previous definitions about terrorism and fully referring to other relevant information and data, this article is devoted to exploring the main characteristics and nature of terrorism, then putting forward a clear, pragmatic and widely accepted definition of terrorism from a relatively unique perspective, and then not only tries to use it as a tool to explain, clarify and solve the problems relating to terrorism in reality, but also deepen the battle against the intangible conception of terrorism by proposing some suggestions to strike at the tangible entity of terrorist organizations and terrorists.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The True Meaning of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism
AU  - Tao Wang
AU  - Jun Zhuang
Y1  - 2017/11/21
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 160
EP  - 168
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20170606.13
AB  - This research mainly focuses on the divergences and controversies over defining terrorism and how to define, understand and deal with terrorism. Based on the systematic survey and study of previous definitions about terrorism and fully referring to other relevant information and data, this article is devoted to exploring the main characteristics and nature of terrorism, then putting forward a clear, pragmatic and widely accepted definition of terrorism from a relatively unique perspective, and then not only tries to use it as a tool to explain, clarify and solve the problems relating to terrorism in reality, but also deepen the battle against the intangible conception of terrorism by proposing some suggestions to strike at the tangible entity of terrorist organizations and terrorists.
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download